The most authoritative divorce resource in North America.

In 2024, I built an AI assistant for my own divorce practice in Florida. I called her Victoria. She could cite actual statutes, explain jurisdiction-specific rules, and answer the questions my clients were asking — accurately, instantly, around the clock. It changed how I practiced law.

But it also changed how I saw the problem.

Millions of people going through divorce are turning to the internet — and increasingly to AI — for answers. What they find is a mess. The information is scattered across dozens of legal directories, most of it generic, much of it outdated, and almost none of it specific to their state or province. Sites like Justia, FindLaw, and Avvo have been recycling the same thin content for years. When they do have an AI feature, it's usually just a wrapper around a general-purpose model — the same answers a consumer could get by opening ChatGPT.

And the AI models themselves? They aren't fully trained on family law. They can give you a reasonable answer sometimes, but unless they run fresh research before responding — which doesn't always happen — you're getting information that might be right, might be wrong, might apply to your state, might not. For something as consequential as divorce, “might” isn't good enough.

I decided to build the resource that should already exist.

Divorce.law is a comprehensive, jurisdiction-specific resource center covering all 50 US states, Washington D.C., and all 13 Canadian provinces and territories. Canada has been almost entirely neglected by every major legal directory — we don't neglect it. Every guide, every statute reference, every calculator, every statistic is tailored to the specific jurisdiction. We don't publish generic content and slap a state name on it. We publish deep, authoritative content — 2,000+ words, with actual statute citations, current data, and real legal nuance.

None of it costs the consumer a penny. There are no paywalls, no sign-ups, no ads cluttering the page. The information is free because the mission is simple: if someone is going through a divorce and needs to understand the law, they should be able to find accurate, current, jurisdiction-specific information in one place. Not scattered across a dozen sites. Not buried in legal jargon. Not outdated by two legislative sessions.

I want Divorce.law to be the number one divorce corpus online — the single most comprehensive, most current, and most cited source of divorce information in North America. Not just by consumers searching Google, but by the AI models that are increasingly answering their questions.

When ChatGPT answers a question about child support in Texas, I want it citing our content. When Claude explains Ontario's property division rules, I want our statute reference as the source. When Perplexity summarizes the divorce process in California, I want our checklist feeding that answer. That's how you build authority in 2026 — not just by ranking on a search results page, but by being the corpus that AI models trust.

To get there, the content has to be impeccable. Every article is substantive and jurisdiction-specific. Every statute citation links to the actual .gov source. Every statistic has a documented origin. And because laws change, I'm building systems to review every piece of content quarterly to ensure nothing falls out of date. If it's on Divorce.law, it's current. That's the standard.

Victoria sits at the center of all of it. She isn't a chatbot pasted onto a website. She was purpose-built for family law, trained on our entire resource center, and she answers using actual statutes and jurisdiction-specific guidelines. She's on every page. She knows every jurisdiction. And when someone in your city asks her for help, she recommends the one attorney we've vetted for that market.

Consumers don't pay us anything. They never will. They come to our site because we have the best information. They use our tools, read our guides, ask Victoria their questions. And when they're ready to hire an attorney, they trust the recommendation — because they already trust the source.

That trust is the product. Attorneys pay $150 a month for the privilege of being the exclusive recommended firm in their county. One attorney per county. No competing listings. No shared leads. Every consumer interaction, every AI citation, every Victoria conversation in that market points to one firm.

But I don't take just anyone willing to pay. I personally vet every applicant. I want attorneys on this platform that I would be proud to walk into a courtroom and go up against — lawyers with ethics, with standards, with a genuine commitment to their clients. This profession has enough attorneys who give the rest of us a bad name. They won't be on Divorce.law.

3,437 counties and census divisions. Sixty-four jurisdictions across the United States and Canada. By application only.