Brad Pitt filed a motion on March 17, 2026, asking a Los Angeles Superior Court judge to compel Russian billionaire Yuri Shefler to sit for a deposition in the ongoing $500 million Château Miraval winery dispute with Angelina Jolie. Pitt alleges Shefler orchestrated Jolie's 2021 sale of her 50% stake to his Stoli Group without Pitt's required consent, and the case is now headed toward a February 2027 trial that could reshape how California courts handle high-value community property sales to third parties.
Key Facts
| Detail | Summary |
|---|---|
| What happened | Brad Pitt filed a motion to compel Yuri Shefler's deposition in the Château Miraval winery lawsuit |
| When | March 17, 2026 |
| Where | Los Angeles Superior Court, California |
| Who is affected | Brad Pitt, Angelina Jolie, Yuri Shefler (Stoli Group), and divorcing spouses with jointly owned businesses |
| Key legal issue | Whether Jolie's sale of her 50% stake required Pitt's consent under California community property law |
| Estimated value | $500 million (Château Miraval winery and estate) |
| Trial date | February 2027 |
Why This Deposition Motion Matters Legally
This motion is not routine discovery housekeeping. Pitt's legal team needs Shefler's testimony to establish that the Stoli Group CEO was not a passive buyer but an active participant who allegedly engineered a transaction designed to cut Pitt out of his ownership rights. Under California law, depositions of non-party witnesses located outside the United States present significant procedural hurdles that can delay litigation by months or derail trial preparation entirely.
According to TMZ, Shefler is currently in Switzerland and resisting the deposition. California courts have the authority to order depositions of non-residents under Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 2025.260, but enforcing that order against someone in a foreign country requires cooperation through international treaties like the Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad. Swiss courts are not obligated to compel a deposition simply because a California judge orders one, which means Pitt's team may face a lengthy international enforcement process with the February 2027 trial clock ticking.
The broader legal significance here is what Shefler's testimony could prove. If Pitt's attorneys can establish that Shefler knew Jolie lacked authority to sell her stake unilaterally, that opens the door to claims of tortious interference with contractual relations and potentially punitive damages beyond the $500 million asset value itself.
How California Law Handles This
California is a community property state, and under Cal. Fam. Code § 760, assets acquired during marriage are presumed to be owned equally (50/50) by both spouses. The Pitts purchased Château Miraval in 2008 and married in 2014, making the winery's classification a central question in the litigation.
The critical statute in this dispute is Cal. Fam. Code § 1100, which governs the management and control of community property. Section 1100(b) explicitly states that neither spouse may sell, convey, or encumber community real property without the written consent of the other spouse. This is not a discretionary standard. It is a hard rule. A sale made without spousal consent is voidable under Cal. Fam. Code § 1102, which means the non-consenting spouse can seek to have the transaction set aside entirely.
Pitt's complaint reportedly alleges that Jolie sold her 50% interest in Miraval's parent company, Quimicum, to Shefler's Tenute del Mondo (a Stoli Group subsidiary) in October 2021 for a reported $67 million. Pitt contends that their original purchase agreement included a mutual consent clause requiring both parties to approve any sale of their respective interests. If the court finds such a clause existed and was enforceable, Jolie's unilateral sale would constitute a breach of contract regardless of the community property analysis.
California courts also apply the fiduciary duty standard between spouses under Cal. Fam. Code § 721, which imposes the highest duty of good faith on spouses managing community assets. This duty survives separation and continues until community property is finally divided by the court. Jolie filed for divorce in September 2016, but the winery had not been formally divided at the time of the 2021 sale, meaning Pitt's attorneys can argue the fiduciary obligation was still in effect.
The discovery issue adds another layer. Under Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 2017.010, parties are entitled to discovery of any matter relevant to the subject matter of the pending action. Shefler's knowledge of the consent requirement, his negotiations with Jolie, and the terms of the acquisition are all directly relevant. California courts have broad discretion to order depositions when the testimony is material to the claims at issue, and a $500 million asset dispute easily clears that threshold.
Practical Takeaways
-
Written consent requirements in buy-sell agreements between spouses are enforceable in California courts. If you co-own a business or real property with your spouse, any sale agreement should include explicit mutual consent provisions, and those provisions should be referenced in any eventual divorce settlement.
-
Community property protections under Cal. Fam. Code § 1100 apply to business interests and real property alike. You cannot sell your share of a jointly owned asset during divorce proceedings without your spouse's written consent, even if you hold legal title to that share through a separate entity.
-
Fiduciary duties between spouses do not end at separation. Under Cal. Fam. Code § 721, the duty of good faith continues until all community property is formally divided. Any transaction that diminishes the value of community assets or transfers ownership without consent can be challenged.
-
International discovery is expensive and time-consuming. If your divorce involves assets held by foreign nationals or entities outside the United States, budget for the additional cost of international depositions, which can range from $50,000 to $200,000 or more depending on the jurisdiction and complexity.
-
Trial dates create urgency around discovery disputes. With a February 2027 trial date, Pitt's team has roughly 11 months to secure Shefler's testimony. Divorcing spouses should be aware that discovery delays can push trial dates and increase litigation costs significantly.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a spouse sell their share of a business without the other spouse's consent in California?
No. Under Cal. Fam. Code § 1100(b), neither spouse may sell, convey, or encumber community real property or business interests without the written consent of the other spouse. A sale made without consent is voidable under Section 1102, meaning the non-consenting spouse can petition the court to reverse the transaction entirely.
What happens if a third party buys property from one spouse without the other's consent?
The non-consenting spouse can petition to have the sale set aside under Cal. Fam. Code § 1102. California courts can void the transaction and restore the asset to community property status. The third-party buyer may also face claims for tortious interference if they knew or should have known consent was required. In the Miraval case, Pitt's deposition of Shefler appears aimed at establishing exactly that knowledge.
How long do spousal fiduciary duties last after separation in California?
Fiduciary duties between spouses under Cal. Fam. Code § 721 continue from the date of marriage until the community property is finally divided by the court or by agreement. Separation alone does not end the duty. In the Pitt-Jolie case, the couple separated in September 2016 but the winery had not been divided by the time of the October 2021 sale, meaning the fiduciary duty was still active.
Can California courts compel a foreign national to sit for a deposition?
California courts can order the deposition under Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 2025.260, but enforcement against a person located outside the United States typically requires proceedings under the Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad. Swiss courts are not automatically bound by California orders, so the process can take 6 to 12 months and cost $50,000 or more in legal fees.
What is the estimated value of the Château Miraval winery?
The dispute values Château Miraval at approximately $500 million, according to court filings reported by TMZ. Jolie reportedly sold her 50% stake for $67 million in October 2021 to Yuri Shefler's Stoli Group subsidiary, Tenute del Mondo. Pitt's legal team contends that this sale price undervalued Jolie's share and that the transaction should not have occurred without his consent.
Connect with a California family law attorney to understand how community property rules apply to your specific situation.
This article discusses recent news and provides general legal commentary. It does not constitute legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified family law attorney for advice specific to your situation.