South Carolina lawmakers advanced two companion bills — H4622 in House Judiciary and S0901 in Senate Judiciary — that would require family court judges to begin every custody case with a rebuttable 50-50 parenting presumption unless a parent is proven unfit. Chief Justice John Kittredge publicly warned the legislation 'ties judges' hands' and could displace the best-interest standard codified at S.C. Code § 63-15-240.
Key Facts
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| What happened | H4622 and S0901 (Equal Parenting Act) advanced in committee April 2026 |
| When | April 2026 committee hearings; floor vote expected before session ends June 4, 2026 |
| Where | South Carolina General Assembly (House Judiciary + Senate Judiciary) |
| Who's affected | All South Carolina parents in contested custody cases (~12,000 annually) |
| Key statute affected | S.C. Code § 63-15-240 (best-interest factors) |
| National context | Would make SC the 7th state with 50-50 custody presumption (after KY, AZ, WV, AR, FL partial, MS HB 1662) |
Why This Matters Legally
The Equal Parenting Act fundamentally restructures the burden of proof in South Carolina custody litigation. Under the current framework set out in S.C. Code § 63-15-240, judges weigh 17 best-interest factors with no starting presumption — each parent begins on equal footing and the court decides based on evidence. H4622/S0901 would flip that model: the court must enter a 50-50 order unless a party proves, by a preponderance of the evidence, that equal time is contrary to the child's best interest or that a parent is unfit.
Chief Justice Kittredge's April 2026 public statement is procedurally unusual. Sitting chief justices rarely comment on pending legislation, but Kittredge argued the bill strips judicial discretion and forces judges to order arrangements that may not fit the facts. His concern tracks a 2022 American Bar Association position paper opposing mandatory joint custody presumptions on the grounds that one-size-fits-all rules fail high-conflict, domestic-violence, and long-distance cases.
Supporters counter that the 50-50 default reduces litigation costs (South Carolina contested custody cases average $15,000-$40,000 per side), ends the perception of maternal preference, and aligns with 30+ years of developmental research showing children benefit from substantial time with both fit parents.
How South Carolina Law Handles Custody Today
South Carolina currently uses a pure best-interest standard with no custody presumption. S.C. Code § 63-15-240(B) lists 17 factors judges must consider, including the child's temperament, each parent's capacity to meet developmental needs, the child's wishes (if of sufficient age), history of domestic abuse, and the ability of parents to cooperate. S.C. Code § 63-15-230 defines joint custody and sole custody but does not prefer one over the other.
Judges retain broad discretion under S.C. Code § 63-15-210, which gives family courts authority to fashion any custody arrangement that serves the child's welfare. The South Carolina Supreme Court reaffirmed this discretionary standard in Clark v. Clark, 423 S.C. 596 (2018), holding that appellate courts will not disturb custody decisions absent an abuse of discretion.
H4622/S0901 would amend § 63-15-240 by inserting a new subsection requiring judges to begin analysis with the 50-50 presumption. A parent seeking unequal time would carry the burden to prove — with specific evidence tied to statutory factors — that equal time harms the child. The bills preserve fitness exceptions for abuse, neglect, substance abuse, and abandonment.
Seven states already operate under some form of joint custody presumption. Kentucky (KRS 403.270, enacted 2018) was first; Arizona, West Virginia, Arkansas, and Mississippi's HB 1662 (effective July 1, 2025) followed. Florida adopted a partial presumption in 2023 (Fla. Stat. § 61.13). Research from the University of Kentucky's 2021 study showed a 12% decrease in custody filings and 18% reduction in post-decree modification motions after the Kentucky presumption took effect.
Practical Takeaways for South Carolina Parents
-
Track the legislative calendar. The SC General Assembly session ends June 4, 2026. If H4622/S0901 passes both chambers and is signed by Governor McMaster, the law likely takes effect January 1, 2027 — meaning cases filed before that date will still be decided under the current best-interest standard.
-
Document your parenting involvement now. Under either framework, judges weigh each parent's historical caregiving role. Keep records of school pickups, medical appointments, homework help, and extracurriculars. Courts give substantial weight to documented parenting patterns in the 12-24 months preceding filing.
-
Understand what 'unfit' means. South Carolina law defines parental unfitness narrowly — typically requiring evidence of abuse, chronic substance use, severe mental illness affecting parenting, abandonment, or criminal conduct endangering the child. Poor communication or disagreements with your co-parent will not clear that bar.
-
Consider mediation before filing. S.C. ADR Rule 4 already requires mediation in most contested family court cases. If H4622/S0901 passes, parents who can negotiate a workable schedule will avoid forcing a judge into a mandated 50-50 default that may not match their logistics.
-
Get a consultation with a South Carolina family law attorney if a custody case is pending. The statutory landscape could shift mid-case, and transition provisions in H4622/S0901 have not yet been finalized.
Frequently Asked Questions
If the Equal Parenting Act passes, does that mean every South Carolina parent gets 50-50 automatically?
No. H4622/S0901 creates a rebuttable presumption, not a mandate. A parent can overcome the 50-50 default by proving, through specific evidence tied to § 63-15-240 factors, that equal time is contrary to the child's best interest. Evidence of domestic abuse, substance abuse, or parental unfitness will still result in unequal custody.
How does South Carolina's proposal compare to Mississippi's HB 1662?
Mississippi's HB 1662 took effect July 1, 2025, establishing a rebuttable 50-50 presumption with similar fitness exceptions. South Carolina's H4622/S0901 follows the same rebuttable-presumption model rather than Kentucky's stronger framework, which requires 'clear and convincing evidence' to rebut. SC's standard would use 'preponderance of the evidence' — a lower bar.
Can a South Carolina judge still consider domestic violence if the presumption passes?
Yes. Both H4622 and S0901 preserve S.C. Code § 63-15-240(B)(15), which requires judges to consider domestic violence history. A documented history of abuse against the other parent or child rebuts the 50-50 presumption and typically results in supervised visitation or sole custody to the non-abusive parent.
When would the new law take effect if enacted?
If H4622 or S0901 passes by the June 4, 2026 session end and Governor McMaster signs, the law would most likely take effect January 1, 2027, matching the typical 6-month implementation window for South Carolina family law statutes. Cases filed before the effective date generally proceed under prior law.
Does Chief Justice Kittredge's opposition mean the bill will fail?
No. Judicial opposition carries political weight but does not block legislation. Mississippi's Chief Justice also opposed HB 1662 and it passed. The SC General Assembly has a Republican supermajority in both chambers, and the bill has bipartisan co-sponsors. Committee advancement in April 2026 suggests momentum, though floor whip counts have not been published.
Talk to a South Carolina Family Law Attorney
Custody law is shifting across the country, and South Carolina may soon join the states with a 50-50 presumption. Whether the Equal Parenting Act passes or not, the best time to plan your case is before you file. A South Carolina family law attorney can explain how current § 63-15-240 factors apply to your situation and how a legislative change might affect a pending matter.
This article discusses recent news and provides general legal commentary. It does not constitute legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified family law attorney for advice specific to your situation.