Michigan grandparents can petition for court-ordered grandparenting time only under six specific qualifying circumstances listed in Mich. Comp. Laws § 722.27b. To win, a grandparent must rebut a presumption favoring fit parents and prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that denying visitation creates a substantial risk of harm to the child's mental, physical, or emotional health.
Key Facts: Grandparent Visitation in Michigan
| Factor | Michigan Rule |
|---|---|
| Governing Statute | Mich. Comp. Laws § 722.27b (grandparenting time) |
| Filing Fee (Circuit Court) | $175 without minor children; $255 with minor children (Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.2529) |
| Divorce Residency Requirement | 180 days in Michigan + 10 days in filing county (Mich. Comp. Laws § 552.9) |
| Standard of Proof | Preponderance of the evidence; must rebut fit-parent presumption |
| Filing Frequency Limit | Once every 2 years, absent good cause |
| Effect of Adoption | Terminates rights (except stepparent adoption) |
| Where to File | Circuit court with continuing jurisdiction over the family matter |
Fees are accurate as of June 2026. Verify with your local circuit court clerk before filing.
Do Grandparents Have Visitation Rights in Michigan?
Grandparents in Michigan have no automatic right to visitation; they must qualify under one of six standing circumstances in Mich. Comp. Laws § 722.27b and then overcome a constitutional presumption favoring fit parents. Without a qualifying circumstance, a court must dismiss the case before any hearing. Michigan deliberately limited grandparent visitation rights after constitutional litigation.
The restrictive framework traces to two landmark decisions. In Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (2000), the United States Supreme Court held that fit parents have a fundamental constitutional right to direct their children's upbringing. Three years later, in DeRose v. DeRose, 469 Mich. 320 (2003), the Michigan Supreme Court struck down the prior grandparent visitation statute as unconstitutional because it failed to defer to fit parents' decisions. The Legislature rewrote the law to require deference to parents, which is why grandparent visitation rights in Michigan now begin from the presumption that a fit parent's denial does not harm the child. This is the single most important concept for any grandparent considering legal action.
Who Can File: The Six Qualifying Circumstances
A Michigan grandparent has standing to seek grandparenting time only if one of six statutory circumstances exists under Mich. Comp. Laws § 722.27b(1). If none applies, the circuit court lacks authority and must dismiss the petition immediately, regardless of how strong the grandparent's relationship with the child may be. Standing is the threshold every grandparent custody or access case must clear first.
The statute permits a grandparent to seek an order under one or more of these conditions. First, a divorce, separate maintenance, or annulment action involving the child's parents is pending. Second, the child's parents are divorced, separated under a judgment of separate maintenance, or have had their marriage annulled. Third, the grandparent's own child (the child's parent) is deceased. Fourth, the parents never married, do not live in the same household, and paternity has been legally established. Fifth, legal custody was given to someone other than a parent, or the child lives outside a parent's home. Sixth, in the year before filing, the grandparent provided an established custodial environment for the child, whether or not under a court order. Each pathway reflects a family disruption that Michigan treats as opening a narrow door to third party visitation.
The Fit-Parent Presumption and Substantial Risk of Harm
Even with standing, a Michigan grandparent must rebut a statutory presumption that a fit parent's decision to deny grandparenting time does not create a substantial risk of harm to the child. To overcome it, the grandparent must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that denial creates a substantial risk of harm to the child's mental, physical, or emotional health under Mich. Comp. Laws § 722.27b(4). This is a demanding evidentiary burden.
The "substantial risk of harm" standard is far higher than showing that grandparent access would simply benefit the child. A grandparent cannot win merely by proving a loving bond or that contact would be pleasant. The grandparent must produce concrete evidence that cutting off the relationship would actually endanger the grandchild's well-being. If the grandparent fails to rebut the presumption, Mich. Comp. Laws § 722.27b directs the court to dismiss the complaint or deny the motion outright. Only after the presumption is rebutted does the analysis advance to whether grandparenting time serves the child's best interests. In practice, this two-step structure means most contested grandparent visitation cases in Michigan turn on whether the harm threshold is met, not on the warmth of the family relationship. Courts apply the deference Troxel and DeRose require.
The Two-Parent Opposition Bar
When both of a child's parents are fit and jointly sign a sworn affidavit opposing grandparenting time, the Michigan court must dismiss the petition without any hearing under Mich. Comp. Laws § 722.27b(5). The joint opposition of two fit parents ends the case immediately, with no weighing of evidence and no opportunity for the grandparent to argue the merits. This is the most powerful tool fit parents have against a grandparent access claim.
The rule reflects the constitutional principle that two fit parents acting together hold the strongest claim to decide who spends time with their child. There is one narrow exception. The two-parent opposition bar does not apply when one of the fit parents is a stepparent who adopted the child under the Michigan Adoption Code, and the grandparent seeking the order is the natural or adoptive parent of the child's deceased parent (or a parent whose rights were terminated). Outside that exception, a unified front by both fit parents is decisive. Grandparents facing two opposing fit parents generally cannot proceed, which is why timing — for example, filing during a pending divorce when parents are not aligned — often determines whether a case can move forward at all.
The Ten Best-Interest Factors
If a grandparent rebuts the fit-parent presumption, the Michigan court then decides, by a preponderance of the evidence, whether grandparenting time serves the child's best interests using ten factors in Mich. Comp. Laws § 722.27b(6). This is the final step, reached only after the harm threshold is cleared. The court must find that an order affirmatively benefits the child.
The ten statutory factors guide the court's discretion in any grandparent visitation or access dispute:
- The love, affection, and other emotional ties between the grandparent and the child
- The length and quality of the prior relationship, the role the grandparent performed, and the child's existing emotional ties to the grandparent
- The grandparent's moral fitness
- The grandparent's mental and physical health
- The child's reasonable preference, if the court considers the child old enough to express one
- The effect on the child of any hostility between the grandparent and the parent
- The willingness of the grandparent, except in cases of abuse or neglect, to encourage a close relationship between the child and the parent
- Any history of physical, emotional, or sexual abuse or neglect by the grandparent
- Whether a parent's decision to deny grandparenting time is related to the child's well-being or is unrelated to it
- Any other relevant factor
The court weighs these factors together. No single factor is decisive, and the grandparent carries the burden throughout.
How to File and What It Costs
A Michigan grandparent files a complaint or motion for grandparenting time in the circuit court that has continuing jurisdiction over the family matter, with circuit court filing fees of $175 without minor children or $255 with minor children under Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.2529. The petition must include a sworn affidavit setting out the facts supporting the request. Fee waivers are available for qualifying low-income filers.
The court with continuing jurisdiction is the one that handled the underlying divorce, custody, or paternity matter — and it is not necessarily located where the grandchild currently lives. A grandparent must attach an affidavit alleging facts that, if true, would establish standing and rebut the fit-parent presumption. Michigan limits filing frequency: a grandparent may file only once every two years absent good cause under Mich. Comp. Laws § 722.27b(8). If a grandparent demonstrates good cause, the court must allow an additional filing. Fee waivers under Michigan Court Rule 2.002 (form MC 20) are automatically approved for filers receiving means-tested public assistance such as SNAP, Medicaid, FIP/TANF, WIC, or SSI; other applicants are evaluated against roughly 125% of the federal poverty guidelines. Verify all fees with your county circuit court clerk before filing, as amounts are set by statute and updated periodically.
Adoption, Paternity, and Special Situations
Adoption generally terminates a grandparent's right to seek visitation in Michigan, with the key exception being stepparent adoption, where the parent of a deceased parent of the child retains the right to file under Mich. Comp. Laws § 722.27b. Once a child is adopted or placed for adoption by someone outside the family, biological grandparents typically lose standing entirely. Paternity rules add further limits for paternal grandparents.
When parents never married, paternal grandparents cannot file unless the father's paternity has been formally established — by acknowledgment of parentage, an order of filiation under the Paternity Act, or a court determination of fatherhood. If the father is merely a "putative" father rather than a legally established one, his parents must additionally show that he has provided regular financial support or care for the child. Recent appellate law also clarified procedure: in Mack v. Schmaus (2025), the Michigan Court of Appeals held that grandparents who submit affidavits are entitled to an evidentiary hearing — an opportunity to testify — rather than being forced to rebut the fit-parent presumption before any hearing occurs. This 2025 ruling strengthened the procedural rights of grandparents at the threshold stage, even though the substantive harm standard remains unchanged. These special situations make experienced legal guidance especially valuable for any grandparent custody or access claim.
Grandparent Visitation vs. Grandparent Custody
Grandparenting time and grandparent custody are distinct legal claims in Michigan: visitation under Mich. Comp. Laws § 722.27b grants scheduled access, while custody under Mich. Comp. Laws § 722.26b grants decision-making authority and requires the much higher showing that the child lives with the grandparent in an established custodial environment. The two should not be confused; they involve different statutes, standards, and outcomes.
Grandparenting time is the more limited request — periodic contact, often comparable to a visitation schedule. A grandparent seeking custody must generally show an established custodial environment, meaning the child looks to the grandparent over an appreciable time for guidance, discipline, and the necessities of life. Custody disputes between a grandparent and a fit parent face the same constitutional deference established in Troxel and DeRose, plus a separate "clear and convincing evidence" framework once an established custodial environment exists with the parent. The table below summarizes the practical differences.
| Feature | Grandparenting Time | Grandparent Custody |
|---|---|---|
| Governing Statute | Mich. Comp. Laws § 722.27b | Mich. Comp. Laws § 722.26b |
| What It Grants | Scheduled visitation/access | Legal and physical custody, decision-making |
| Core Requirement | Rebut fit-parent presumption; substantial risk of harm | Established custodial environment with grandparent |
| Typical Burden | Preponderance of the evidence | Heightened; clear and convincing in many situations |
| Filing Frequency Limit | Once every 2 years absent good cause | Governed by general custody rules |