'Bachelor' winner Courtney Robertson filed for divorce in Arizona on July 11, 2026, ending her nearly six-year marriage to attorney Humberto Preciado and seeking child support, spousal support, and joint legal decision-making with final say over their three children. Because Arizona is a pure no-fault state under A.R.S. § 25-312, her cited reason—damaged trust—carries zero legal weight in how a judge divides property or awards support.
Robertson, who won Ben Flajnik's 2012 season of 'The Bachelor,' described the marriage as 'irretrievably broken,' the exact statutory language Arizona courts require to grant a divorce, according to TMZ. The filing spotlights how Arizona's community-property and no-fault framework treats every divorce the same, whether the spouse is a reality-TV personality or not.
| Detail | Summary |
|---|---|
| What happened | Courtney Robertson filed for divorce from Humberto Preciado |
| When | July 11, 2026 (reported July 13, 2026) |
| Where | Arizona (community-property, no-fault state) |
| Who's affected | Both spouses and their three young children |
| Key statute/rule | A.R.S. § 25-312 (no-fault dissolution); A.R.S. § 25-211 (community property) |
| Impact | Requests for child support, spousal support, and joint legal decision-making with final say |
Why this matters legally
Arizona grants divorces on a single ground: the marriage is 'irretrievably broken.' No spouse must prove adultery, cruelty, or a betrayal of trust to end the marriage under A.R.S. § 25-312. Robertson's public statement about damaged trust is emotionally significant but legally irrelevant to the outcome. Arizona courts will not weigh who caused the breakdown when dividing assets or calculating support.
This distinction confuses many people. In fault states, marital misconduct can influence property or alimony awards. In Arizona, it cannot. A judge applies the same neutral formulas regardless of the reason for the split. Understanding no-fault divorce is the first step for any Arizona resident, because it reframes the entire case around finances and children rather than blame or vindication.
How Arizona law handles this
Arizona is one of nine community-property states, which shapes everything about a divorce like Robertson's. Under A.R.S. § 25-211, most property and debt acquired during the marriage belongs equally to both spouses. At divorce, A.R.S. § 25-318 directs courts to divide that community property 'equitably,' which in Arizona practice usually means a roughly equal 50/50 split. Property either spouse owned before the marriage, or received by gift or inheritance, remains separate.
On support, Arizona treats children and spouses under two separate statutory schemes. Child support follows the Arizona Child Support Guidelines under A.R.S. § 25-320, an income-shares model that combines both parents' gross incomes, then allocates a support obligation based on parenting time and the number of children. The formula is largely mathematical, so a parent's income and overnights drive the number more than any narrative about the marriage. You can estimate a range using our child support calculator.
Spousal maintenance is different and far more discretionary. Under A.R.S. § 25-319, a spouse must first qualify by meeting statutory eligibility factors—such as lacking sufficient property to meet reasonable needs or being unable to be self-sufficient. Only after a spouse qualifies does the court set the amount and duration, weighing marriage length, standard of living, and earning capacity. A nearly six-year marriage sits in a middle range where maintenance is possible but not automatic. Because spousal support can later be modified when circumstances change, initial awards are rarely the final word.
Robertson's request for joint legal decision-making with final say reflects A.R.S. § 25-403, which governs legal decision-making and parenting time. Arizona uses the terms 'legal decision-making' and 'parenting time' rather than 'custody.' Courts decide based on the best interests of the child, evaluating factors like each parent's relationship with the child, the child's adjustment to home and community, and each parent's willingness to co-parent. A 'final say' provision is a recognized compromise that keeps both parents involved while breaking deadlocks.
Practical takeaways
-
Stop looking for legal leverage in your spouse's misconduct. In Arizona, fault does not change property division or support under A.R.S. § 25-312. Redirect that energy toward organizing your finances.
-
Gather complete financial records early. Because A.R.S. § 25-211 makes marital income and debt community property, you will need pay stubs, bank statements, retirement accounts, and debt balances to establish an accurate 50/50 baseline.
-
Separate the child-support question from the spousal-support question. Child support is a guideline calculation under A.R.S. § 25-320; spousal maintenance is discretionary under A.R.S. § 25-319. They are decided independently.
-
Track your parenting time precisely. The number of annual overnights directly affects the child-support figure. Use our parenting time calculator to model different schedules.
-
Understand what 'final say' really means. A joint legal decision-making order with tie-breaking authority under A.R.S. § 25-403 is common, but courts scrutinize it against the child's best interests, not either parent's preference.
-
Map your timeline realistically. Arizona imposes a 60-day cooling-off period from service before a divorce can be finalized. See our Arizona divorce cost estimator to plan for expenses.
High-profile filings like Robertson's are useful reminders that Arizona law applies uniformly, but the details of any individual case turn on specific facts. If you are facing a similar situation, a personalized divorce roadmap can help you understand your next steps, and connecting with an experienced Arizona divorce attorney ensures your support and decision-making requests are properly framed under state law.
This article discusses recent news and provides general legal commentary. It does not constitute legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified family law attorney for advice specific to your situation.