Skip to main content
News & Commentary

Gleb Savchenko Custody Fight: Hong Kong Move & California Jurisdiction Explained

DWTS pro Gleb Savchenko's July 13 emergency custody filing tests California's UCCJEA jurisdiction rules and the Hague Convention over a Hong Kong move.

By Antonio G. Jimenez, Esq.California5 min read

On July 13, 2025, Dancing With the Stars pro Gleb Savchenko filed an emergency custody request in Los Angeles Superior Court, accusing ex-wife Elena Samodanova of "abducting" their 15-year-old daughter to Hong Kong by converting a temporary one-year stay into permanent residency. For California parents, this dispute turns on one decisive question: which country's courts have jurisdiction — and California's answer depends on where the child has lived for the past six months.

Key Facts

ItemDetail
What happenedGleb Savchenko filed an emergency request for sole custody, alleging his ex-wife breached a 2023 agreement by making a temporary Hong Kong stay permanent
WhenFiled July 13, 2025; mediation ordered for August 5, 2025
WhereLos Angeles Superior Court (California)
Who's affectedSavchenko, ex-wife Elena Samodanova, and their daughter Olivia (15)
Key legal frameworkCalifornia UCCJEA (Fam. Code §§ 3400–3465) and the 1980 Hague Convention on International Child Abduction
ImpactCourt must decide whether California or Hong Kong is the child's "home state" before ruling on custody

As reported by E! News, Samodanova responded that California lacks jurisdiction and that Hong Kong is now the child's permanent home. The court ordered mediation for August 5 before any hearing on the merits.

Why this matters legally

International relocation disputes are decided by jurisdiction first, custody second — and the parent who controls jurisdiction usually controls the outcome. Before a California judge can weigh who is the better custodial parent, the court must confirm it has legal authority to hear the case at all. If Hong Kong is deemed the child's home, a California order may be unenforceable and the case belongs in a Hong Kong court.

This sequencing is what makes cases like Savchenko's so contentious. A parent who quietly converts a "temporary" foreign stay into permanent residency can, over time, shift the child's home state to another country. Once six months pass in the new location, the original state's courts often lose their exclusive jurisdiction. That is precisely the argument Samodanova is raising, and it is why the timing and terms of the original 2023 agreement — whether the move was explicitly temporary — will be central to the fight.

How California law handles this

California decides interstate and international custody jurisdiction under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act, codified at Cal. Fam. Code § 3421. The core test is the child's "home state": the state (or country) where the child lived with a parent for at least six consecutive months immediately before the custody proceeding began. Under Cal. Fam. Code § 3402, that six-month rule treats a foreign country like Hong Kong the same as a U.S. state for home-state purposes.

California can also assert temporary emergency jurisdiction under Cal. Fam. Code § 3424 when a child is present in the state and needs protection, but emergency jurisdiction is limited and does not by itself override another forum's home-state authority. If a parent removes a child from the country in violation of a custody agreement, the left-behind parent's primary remedy is often the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, which requires the child's prompt return to the country of habitual residence — though Hong Kong's treaty status and the terms of the parents' agreement will shape whether that remedy applies here.

On the substance of any California custody decision, courts apply the best-interest-of-the-child standard under Cal. Fam. Code § 3011, and a parent seeking to move a child a significant distance faces the relocation framework under Cal. Fam. Code § 7501, which governs a custodial parent's presumptive right to change residence and the other parent's right to contest it. Understanding how California approaches child custody arrangements is the first step for any parent facing a cross-border dispute.

Practical takeaways

If you are a California parent facing a possible international relocation, these steps protect your position:

  1. Get the temporary nature of any move in writing. A 2023-style agreement that labels a stay "temporary for one year" is powerful evidence — but only if it specifies an end date, a return obligation, and that neither parent may seek foreign permanent residency for the child.

  2. Act within the six-month window. Under the UCCJEA home-state rule, delay can transfer jurisdiction abroad. If you believe a temporary stay is becoming permanent, consult a family law attorney before six months pass in the new country.

  3. File in the correct forum. An emergency request under Cal. Fam. Code § 3424 can secure short-term protection, but confirm California's long-term jurisdiction under the home-state test before assuming a California order will hold.

  4. Preserve travel and residency records. Passports, school enrollment, visa applications, and any foreign residency filings can prove whether a move was temporary or permanent — the decisive fact in these disputes.

  5. Build your parenting-time record now. If you expect a custody fight, document your involvement. Our parenting time calculator can help you quantify your current schedule for the court.

  6. Know the Hague Convention path. If a child is wrongfully removed to or retained in a treaty country, the Hague Convention — not a standard custody motion — is usually the correct tool to seek return.

Cross-border custody cases move fast and turn on early, technical jurisdictional decisions. If you are worried about an international move involving your children, start by mapping your options with a personalized divorce roadmap, and consider speaking with a qualified California family law attorney who handles UCCJEA and Hague matters. You can find a divorce attorney in your county to review the specific facts of your situation.

This article discusses recent news and provides general legal commentary. It does not constitute legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified family law attorney for advice specific to your situation.

Key Questions

Can a California court decide custody if my child now lives in another country?

Only if California is the child's "home state" under Cal. Fam. Code § 3421 — meaning the child lived here for at least six consecutive months before the case began. After six months abroad, jurisdiction often shifts to the foreign country's courts.

What is a child's "home state" under California's UCCJEA?

Under Cal. Fam. Code § 3402, a child's home state is where they lived with a parent for at least six consecutive months immediately before a custody proceeding. The 2026 UCCJEA treats a foreign country the same as a U.S. state for this test.

Does the Hague Convention apply if my ex moves our child abroad?

The 1980 Hague Convention requires a wrongfully removed child's return to their country of habitual residence, but it only applies between treaty-member countries and depends on whether the removal breached custody rights. It is a separate remedy from a standard custody motion.

How does California treat a "temporary" relocation that becomes permanent?

California courts scrutinize the original agreement. A written 2023-style agreement stating a move is "temporary for one year" is strong evidence, but if the child stays past six months, the UCCJEA home-state rule under Cal. Fam. Code § 3421 can still transfer jurisdiction abroad.

What is emergency custody jurisdiction in California?

Under Cal. Fam. Code § 3424, a California court can assert temporary emergency jurisdiction when a child is present in the state and needs protection. This authority is limited and does not automatically override another forum's home-state jurisdiction over the child.

Written By

Antonio G. Jimenez, Esq.

Florida Bar No. 21022 | Covering California divorce law

How we source & review this content