Skip to main content
News & Commentary

Lena the Plug Says Divorce Filing Was Forged: CA Fraud Law Explained

Lena the Plug claims a stranger forged her signature on a $435 Adam22 divorce filing. How California Penal Code § 115 treats fraudulent court papers.

By Antonio G. Jimenez, Esq.California6 min read

OnlyFans star Lena the Plug (Lena Nersesian) told TMZ on June 4, 2026, that she never filed for divorce from Adam22 — claiming a stranger forged her signature and submitted dissolution papers in Los Angeles County with a $435 filing fee paid by check. Filing a forged petition in California is a felony under Cal. Penal Code § 115, punishable by up to three years in prison.

Key Facts

DetailSummary
What happenedOutlets reported Lena the Plug filed to divorce Adam22; she now says the filing was forged by a stranger
WhenTMZ reported the denial on June 4, 2026
WhereLos Angeles County Superior Court, California
Who's affectedLena Nersesian, Adam22 (Adam Grandmaison), and their shared minor child
Key statute/ruleCal. Penal Code § 115 (filing false/forged documents); Cal. Fam. Code § 2330 (dissolution petition requirements)
ImpactRaises questions about signature verification, identity theft in court filings, and how California voids a forged petition

Why this matters legally

A divorce filed under a forged signature is void and exposes the forger to felony prosecution in California. Under Cal. Penal Code § 115, knowingly filing any false or forged document with a court that would be entitled to be recorded is a felony — each separate filing counts as a distinct offense, and the statute carries a state prison term of up to three years per count. The reported $435 check used to pay the filing fee creates a documentary trail that investigators can subpoena directly from the bank.

The alleged scheme combines two distinct legal harms. First, the forgery itself violates California's false-filing and forgery statutes. Second, paying a court fee with another person's identity and submitting paperwork in her name implicates identity theft under Cal. Penal Code § 530.5, which makes it a crime to willfully use another person's personal identifying information for any unlawful purpose. When the unlawful purpose is initiating a fraudulent legal proceeding affecting custody of a child, prosecutors treat the conduct as significantly aggravated.

The TMZ report ties the $435 check to a man connected to prior police wellness checks at Lena's home. That detail matters because it potentially links the filing to a specific individual, transforming an anonymous prank into a traceable felony. California courts do not require notarization on a standard dissolution petition, which is precisely why forged family-law filings can slip through intake — the signature on Form FL-100 is verified by the declarant under penalty of perjury, not by a notary.

How California law handles this

California provides specific mechanisms to void a fraudulent dissolution petition and punish the person who filed it. A divorce action in California begins when a petitioner files Form FL-100 under Cal. Fam. Code § 2330, which requires the petition to state the grounds for dissolution and be signed under penalty of perjury. Because the clerk's office does not independently verify identity at intake, the system relies on the perjury declaration and post-filing service rules to catch fraud.

When a person discovers a divorce was filed in their name without authorization, California law allows them to challenge it. Under Cal. Code of Civil Procedure § 473, a party can move to set aside a void filing, and a judgment or order obtained through extrinsic fraud — such as a forged petition — can be vacated even after the normal six-month window because the court never acquired proper jurisdiction over a petition the named party did not actually file. A petition the supposed petitioner never signed is a legal nullity.

California treats forgery of court documents as a wobbler-adjacent serious offense. Cal. Penal Code § 115 classifies filing a forged or false instrument as a straight felony, and the statute expressly states that each filing constitutes a separate violation. If the forger also used Lena's identity to write or authorize the $435 check, Cal. Penal Code § 530.5 identity theft charges can be stacked, each carrying its own potential one-year county jail or state prison exposure. Prosecutors in Los Angeles County would coordinate with the court clerk to authenticate the filing record.

California also gives the victim civil remedies. A person whose identity was used to file fraudulent court papers can pursue a civil claim for identity theft damages under Cal. Civil Code § 1798.93, which allows recovery of actual damages, attorney's fees, and a civil penalty. This means the alleged victim here could both cooperate with a criminal prosecution and separately sue the forger for the disruption, legal costs, and reputational harm caused by the fake filing.

Practical takeaways

  1. Check court records directly if you suspect a filing in your name. In Los Angeles County, you can search the Superior Court's online case index or request records in person to confirm whether a divorce petition (Form FL-100) actually exists under your name.

  2. Act within the response window. A divorce respondent in California has 30 days from service to file a response under Cal. Fam. Code § 2020; if you were never served because the filing was fraudulent, document that immediately so a default judgment cannot be entered against you.

  3. File a police report and a fraud declaration. Report suspected forgery to local law enforcement and notify the court clerk in writing. A formal police report strengthens both the Penal Code § 115 criminal case and any later motion to void the filing.

  4. Preserve the paper trail. The $435 check, envelope, and any electronic submission metadata are evidence. Banks retain check images, and court e-filing systems log IP addresses and account credentials that can identify the filer.

  5. Move promptly to set aside any order. If a court issued any temporary order based on the forged petition, file a motion under Cal. Code of Civil Procedure § 473 to vacate it before it affects custody or property rights.

If you have discovered a divorce or court filing submitted under your name without your authorization, a California family law attorney can help you move quickly to void the filing, protect your custody and property rights, and coordinate with law enforcement. Browse our directory to connect with a divorce attorney in your county.

This article discusses recent news and provides general legal commentary. It does not constitute legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified family law attorney for advice specific to your situation.

Key Questions

Is filing a fake divorce petition a crime in California?

Yes. Under California Penal Code § 115, knowingly filing a forged or false document with a court is a felony punishable by up to three years in state prison. Each separate fraudulent filing counts as its own offense, and adding identity theft under Penal Code § 530.5 can stack additional charges.

How do you cancel a divorce someone filed in your name in California?

File a motion to set aside the void filing under California Code of Civil Procedure § 473. Because a forged petition is a legal nullity, the court never gained proper jurisdiction, so the action can be vacated even after the standard six-month window. File a police report to support the motion.

Does California require notarization on a divorce petition?

No. California's dissolution petition (Form FL-100) is signed under penalty of perjury, not notarized, per Family Code § 2330. The clerk does not verify identity at intake, which is exactly why forged family-law filings can pass through and must be caught by the named party afterward.

Can you sue someone for filing fake court papers in your name?

Yes. California Civil Code § 1798.93 lets identity-theft victims recover actual damages, attorney's fees, and a civil penalty. A person whose name was used to file a fraudulent divorce petition can pursue this civil claim while also cooperating with a criminal prosecution under Penal Code § 115.

What happens if a forged divorce filing leads to a default judgment?

A default judgment based on a forged petition can be vacated as void. California Code of Civil Procedure § 473 allows relief from extrinsic fraud beyond the normal six-month limit because the court never acquired jurisdiction over a petition the named party never actually filed or was served with.

Written By

Antonio G. Jimenez, Esq.

Florida Bar No. 21022 | Covering California divorce law