On April 8, 2026, the New Hampshire Senate Judiciary Committee voted 2-1 "Ought to Pass with Amendment" on HB 1323, advancing legislation that would make New Hampshire the first state in the nation to codify a legal definition of parental alienation. The bill requires family courts to act on alienation-related access motions within 60 days and mandates judicial consideration of alienating behaviors when determining parenting arrangements under RSA 461-A:6.
Key Facts
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| What happened | Senate Judiciary Committee voted 2-1 "Ought to Pass with Amendment" on HB 1323 |
| When | April 8, 2026 (full Senate floor vote expected within weeks) |
| Where | New Hampshire General Court, Concord |
| Who is affected | All New Hampshire parents in contested custody or post-decree modification proceedings |
| Key statute | Amends RSA 461-A:6 (best-interest factors) and RSA 461-A:11 (modification standards) |
| Practical impact | Mandatory 60-day court action on family access motions citing alienation; first statutory definition of parental alienation in the United States |
Why This Matters Legally
HB 1323 transforms parental alienation from a contested clinical concept into an enforceable statutory factor that New Hampshire judges must weigh. For three decades, alienation claims have lived in an evidentiary gray zone — some family courts accept expert testimony on the pattern, others exclude it entirely as lacking scientific consensus. The American Psychological Association has never formally endorsed "parental alienation syndrome," and the DSM-5 does not list it as a diagnosis. That ambiguity has produced inconsistent rulings across the 10 New Hampshire circuit court divisions.
By codifying a definition, the legislature is directing trial judges to stop treating alienation as a debatable theory and start treating it as a statutory best-interest factor — the same category that currently includes domestic violence, substance abuse, and each parent's willingness to foster a relationship with the other parent under RSA 461-A:6, I. The amended version out of committee also imposes a 60-day procedural deadline, which is aggressive by New Hampshire standards where contested parenting motions frequently take 6-9 months to reach hearing.
The Senate amendment narrowed the House version in one important way: it replaced an earlier presumption-shifting clause with language requiring judges to "consider" alienating conduct, preserving judicial discretion rather than mandating a specific custody outcome. That change picked up the second committee vote and likely determines whether the bill survives a floor debate.
How New Hampshire Law Handles This
New Hampshire already addresses the underlying behavior indirectly. RSA 461-A:6, I(g) requires courts to consider "the support of each parent for the child's relationship with the other parent," and RSA 461-A:6, I(h) weighs "the support of each parent for the child's contact with extended family." Judges have long interpreted these factors as a backdoor route to address alienation, but without a statutory definition, the analysis is entirely discretionary.
Under current practice, a New Hampshire parent alleging alienation typically files a motion to modify parenting rights and responsibilities under RSA 461-A:11, which requires a showing of "substantial change in circumstances" affecting the child's best interest. That standard is high, and alienation cases often turn on expert testimony from a Guardian ad Litem appointed under RSA 461-A:16 or a court-ordered psychological evaluation under RSA 461-A:10. Average cost of a GAL investigation in New Hampshire runs $3,500-$8,000, and a full custody evaluation typically runs $5,000-$15,000.
HB 1323 does not eliminate those evidentiary requirements, but the codified definition gives judges a clearer framework for evaluating expert testimony and reduces the risk of reversal on appeal for admitting or excluding alienation evidence. The 60-day action requirement also aligns New Hampshire with family access enforcement timelines already in place in Missouri (RSMo § 452.400) and Texas (Tex. Fam. Code § 157.375).
Practical Takeaways
-
If you have a pending custody case in New Hampshire and believe the other parent is undermining your relationship with your child, document specific incidents now. Keep a contemporaneous log with dates, times, and witnesses. If HB 1323 becomes law before your trial, this documentation becomes directly relevant to a statutory factor.
-
Parents facing alienation allegations should not dismiss the claim. Under the amended bill, a judicial finding of alienating conduct becomes a mandatory consideration in determining parenting time — potentially including reductions in decision-making authority.
-
If you have a family access motion currently pending, ask your attorney about the 60-day action requirement. The Senate amendment would apply to motions filed after the effective date, but transitional rules may affect pending cases.
-
Monitor the Senate floor calendar at gencourt.state.nh.us. The full Senate vote is expected within the next 2-4 weeks, followed by a potential House concurrence vote on the amendment.
-
Therapeutic and reunification resources may become court-ordered remedies under the new framework. Parents in high-conflict cases should identify qualified New Hampshire family therapists now, as court-mandated waitlists for reunification therapy in the Manchester and Nashua areas currently run 8-12 weeks.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does HB 1323 actually define as parental alienation?
The amended committee version defines parental alienation as a pattern of behavior by one parent intended to damage or destroy the child's relationship with the other parent, absent justified cause such as abuse or neglect. The bill requires proof by a preponderance of the evidence and excludes isolated incidents, requiring a documented pattern of at least 60 days.
When will HB 1323 become law if passed?
If the full New Hampshire Senate passes the amended bill within 4 weeks of the April 8, 2026 committee vote, and the House concurs, HB 1323 would take effect 60 days after being signed by Governor Ayotte — likely by August or September 2026. Motions filed after the effective date would be subject to the new 60-day action requirement.
Does HB 1323 create a presumption against an alienating parent?
No. The Senate Judiciary Committee's amendment on April 8, 2026 removed the presumption-shifting language from the House version. The final committee text requires judges to "consider" alienating conduct as a best-interest factor under RSA 461-A:6, but preserves full judicial discretion in determining the appropriate remedy.
How does this compare to other states?
No other US state has codified a statutory definition of parental alienation as of April 2026. Five states (Missouri, Texas, Indiana, Michigan, and Florida) address related conduct through family access enforcement statutes, but none define alienation itself. If enacted, New Hampshire would be the national test case for statutory alienation law.
Will this change my existing custody order?
HB 1323 does not automatically modify existing parenting orders. To modify an existing order under RSA 461-A:11, you still must show a substantial change in circumstances. However, the new statutory definition would apply to any modification motion filed after the effective date, making alienation evidence more admissible and more weighty.
Talk to a New Hampshire Family Law Attorney
If HB 1323 affects a pending or planned custody matter, a New Hampshire family law attorney can help you document evidence, prepare for the 60-day action window, and position your case under the new statutory framework. Find a vetted attorney on our New Hampshire attorney directory.
This article discusses recent news and provides general legal commentary. It does not constitute legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified family law attorney for advice specific to your situation.