Skip to main content
News & Commentary

Sia to Pay Ex $42,500/Month Child Support Under Cal. Fam. Code § 4055

Sia will pay ex-husband Dan Bernad $42,500/month in California child support after he sought $250,856/month in spousal support. Legal analysis.

By Antonio G. Jimenez, Esq.California5 min read

Singer Sia will pay estranged husband Dan Bernad $42,500 per month in child support for their son under a Los Angeles County agreement, plus private school tuition, health insurance, and a $5 million life insurance policy, according to E! News. The deal followed Bernad's request for $250,856/month in temporary spousal support. For California parents, the case illustrates how high-earner child support is calculated under state guidelines.

Key Facts

ItemDetail
What happenedSia agreed to pay ex-husband Dan Bernad $42,500/month in child support
WhenCourt documents filed 2025, Los Angeles County
WhereCalifornia (Los Angeles County Superior Court)
Who's affectedSia, Dan Bernad, and their son Somersault
Key statuteCal. Fam. Code § 4055 (statewide child support guideline)
ImpactBernad sought $250,856/month spousal support; Sia's attorney is Laura Wasser

Why this matters legally

This settlement demonstrates that California child support for high-income earners scales with parental income, not just the child's documented needs. Under California's statewide guideline, support obligations rise substantially when one parent earns at the celebrity level, even when a single child is involved. The $42,500 monthly figure reported by E! News reflects this principle in action.

California courts distinguish sharply between child support and spousal support. Child support belongs to the child and is calculated by a rigid formula; spousal support is discretionary and weighs factors like marriage length and each spouse's earning capacity. Bernad's reported request for $250,856/month in temporary spousal support is separate from the $42,500/month child support he will receive. The two awards serve different legal purposes and are governed by different statutes, which is why public commentary conflating them misunderstands the underlying law.

How California law handles this

California calculates child support using a uniform algebraic formula set out in Cal. Fam. Code § 4055, often called the "guideline" formula. The formula incorporates both parents' net disposable incomes and the percentage of time each parent has primary physical responsibility for the child. Courts apply this guideline statewide, and the resulting number is presumptively correct under Cal. Fam. Code § 4053, which sets out the principles that child support is a parent's first obligation and that children should share in both parents' standard of living.

For extraordinarily high earners, California recognizes a "high-earner" exception. Under Cal. Fam. Code § 4057, a parent whose income is so high that the guideline amount would exceed the child's reasonable needs may rebut the presumption. The high earner bears the burden of proving the formula amount is unjust or inappropriate. In practice, this allows a court to set support based on the child's actual needs measured against the family's lifestyle, which is how seven-figure earners can end up paying tens of thousands per month for a single child.

Spousal support follows a different path. Temporary (pendente lite) spousal support is often calculated using local guideline formulas while a case is pending, but permanent support is governed by the discretionary factors in Cal. Fam. Code § 4320. Those factors include the marital standard of living, each party's earning capacity, the supported spouse's ability to become self-supporting, and the duration of the marriage. A request like the reported $250,856/month figure would be tested against these factors, and a court can attribute earning capacity to a spouse who is voluntarily underemployed.

California also enforces child support obligations beyond the monthly check. Courts routinely order add-ons under Cal. Fam. Code § 4062, including childcare costs related to employment, uninsured health care expenses, and educational or special needs costs. The reported private school tuition and health insurance components of the Sia agreement fall squarely within these statutory add-on categories. A life insurance requirement, like the reported $5 million policy, is a common security provision courts approve to guarantee support continues if the paying parent dies.

Practical takeaways

  1. Understand the guideline formula. California child support starts with the Cal. Fam. Code § 4055 calculation, which uses both parents' net incomes and timeshare percentages. Free online calculators give estimates, but the official DissoMaster software used by courts produces the controlling number.

  2. Separate child support from spousal support. These are distinct awards with different rules. Child support is formula-driven and non-negotiable as the child's right; spousal support is discretionary under Cal. Fam. Code § 4320. Negotiating one does not bind the other.

  3. Account for add-ons. Beyond the base amount, expect to address childcare, uninsured medical costs, and educational expenses under Cal. Fam. Code § 4062. High-asset cases frequently include private school tuition and life insurance security provisions.

  4. Document income accurately. California requires both parents to file Income and Expense Declarations. Underreporting or hiding income can trigger sanctions, and courts can impute income to a voluntarily underemployed parent based on earning capacity rather than actual earnings.

  5. Consider the high-earner exception. If guideline support would far exceed a child's reasonable needs, the high earner can challenge it under Cal. Fam. Code § 4057, but the burden of proof rests on the paying parent.

If you are facing a California divorce involving significant income, child support add-ons, or a disputed spousal support request, speaking with a qualified family law attorney early can clarify your rights and obligations before positions harden. An attorney can run the guideline calculation, evaluate earning-capacity arguments, and structure security provisions like life insurance.

This article discusses recent news and provides general legal commentary. It does not constitute legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified family law attorney for advice specific to your situation.

Key Questions

How is child support calculated in California?

California uses a statewide guideline formula under Cal. Fam. Code § 4055 that incorporates both parents' net disposable incomes and the percentage of time each parent cares for the child. The resulting amount is presumptively correct, and courts use DissoMaster software to calculate it.

Can a high earner pay less than the guideline child support amount in California?

Yes. Under Cal. Fam. Code § 4057, a parent with extraordinarily high income may rebut the guideline if the formula amount exceeds the child's reasonable needs. The high earner bears the burden of proving the guideline figure is unjust or inappropriate given the child's actual needs.

What is the difference between child support and spousal support in California?

Child support belongs to the child and follows a fixed formula under Cal. Fam. Code § 4055. Spousal support is discretionary, decided by the factors in Cal. Fam. Code § 4320, including marriage length and earning capacity. The two awards are separate and governed by different statutes.

Does California child support cover private school and health insurance?

Yes. Under Cal. Fam. Code § 4062, courts add mandatory and discretionary costs on top of base support, including uninsured health care, employment-related childcare, and educational expenses such as private school tuition. Courts can also order life insurance to secure ongoing support obligations.

Can a California court order a parent to carry life insurance for child support?

Yes. California courts commonly require the paying parent to maintain a life insurance policy naming the child as beneficiary to guarantee support continues if that parent dies. This security provision is routinely approved as part of a child support order in high-asset cases.

Written By

Antonio G. Jimenez, Esq.

Florida Bar No. 21022 | Covering California divorce law