British TV presenters Tess Daly and Vernon Kay confirmed the end of their 23-year marriage this week, per HELLO! Magazine. For New York couples, a 23-year marriage triggers presumptions of near-equal property division and potentially permanent maintenance under N.Y. Dom. Rel. Law § 236, governing how decades of shared assets, pensions, and career earnings get divided.
Key Facts
| Detail | Summary |
|---|---|
| What happened | Tess Daly and Vernon Kay confirmed divorce |
| When | Announced this week (2026) |
| Where | United Kingdom |
| Who's affected | Two TV/radio presenters, two children |
| Marriage length | 23 years |
| Key NY analog statute | N.Y. Dom. Rel. Law § 236 |
| NY impact | Long-marriage presumption of equal division + durational maintenance |
The couple married in 2003 and share two daughters. As reported by HELLO! Magazine, both built substantial media careers during the marriage — Daly as the long-running host of Strictly Come Dancing, Kay as a national radio presenter. While the split falls under English law, the legal questions it raises — how to divide 23 years of accumulated assets, pensions, and dual high earnings — map directly onto how New York courts resolve long-marriage divorces.
Why this matters legally
Long marriages fundamentally change how courts divide property and award support. In New York, a 23-year marriage is treated as a "long-term marriage," which strengthens the presumption that marital property should be divided in a manner approaching equality and that the lower-earning spouse may receive maintenance for a longer duration.
New York is an equitable distribution state, not a community property state. That distinction matters: under N.Y. Dom. Rel. Law § 236(B)(5), courts divide marital property based on what is fair, not automatically 50/50. However, after two decades of marriage, "fair" frequently converges toward equal, because both spouses are presumed to have contributed to the marital enterprise — whether through earnings, homemaking, or supporting the other's career. When both spouses earn significant income, as in the Daly-Kay situation, the analysis shifts from spousal support toward untangling jointly built wealth.
The caveat: equitable does not mean identical. Courts still weigh 14 statutory factors, including each spouse's income, health, future earning capacity, and the tax consequences of any division.
How New York law handles this
New York courts apply N.Y. Dom. Rel. Law § 236 to divide marital property acquired during the marriage. Marital property includes real estate, retirement accounts, business interests, and — critically for high earners — the appreciation in value of assets built during the marriage. Separate property (assets owned before marriage or received by gift or inheritance) generally stays with the original owner.
Pensions and retirement accounts are among the most contested assets in long marriages. Under the Majauskas formula, established in Majauskas v. Majauskas, 61 N.Y.2d 481 (1984), the marital portion of a pension is divided using a fraction: months of marriage during employment divided by total months of employment. A Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) then splits the retirement benefit without triggering early-withdrawal penalties. For a 23-year marriage, a substantial share of each spouse's retirement savings will typically qualify as marital property.
Maintenance (spousal support) in New York follows a statutory formula under N.Y. Dom. Rel. Law § 236(B)(6). The law provides an advisory durational schedule: for marriages longer than 20 years, courts may award maintenance for 35% to 50% of the length of the marriage. A 23-year marriage could therefore support a maintenance award lasting roughly 8 to 11.5 years — though when both spouses are high earners, the income disparity that drives maintenance may be minimal, reducing or eliminating any award.
Child-related issues follow a separate track. New York courts determine custody and parenting time based on the best interests of the child, and child support is calculated under the Child Support Standards Act, N.Y. Dom. Rel. Law § 240, using a percentage of combined parental income (17% for one child, 25% for two).
Practical takeaways
-
Inventory every asset acquired during the marriage. In a long marriage, decades of accumulation — homes, brokerage accounts, business equity, and pensions — are presumptively marital property subject to division under N.Y. Dom. Rel. Law § 236.
-
Value retirement accounts early. Pensions and 401(k)s often represent the largest marital asset. Obtain the Majauskas fraction and plan for a QDRO to divide benefits without tax penalties.
-
Document separate property. Assets owned before 2003 (in a 23-year marriage) or inherited during it may remain yours — but only if you can trace and prove their separate character with records.
-
Run the maintenance formula both ways. When both spouses earn well, the statutory maintenance calculation may yield little or nothing. Model your specific income figures before assuming support is owed either direction.
-
Separate the divorce from the children's issues. Custody and child support under N.Y. Dom. Rel. Law § 240 are decided on the best-interests standard and an income-percentage formula — independent of how property is divided.
-
Consider tax consequences. Property transfers between divorcing spouses are generally tax-free, but the future tax character of assets (a Roth account versus a taxable brokerage account of equal face value) can make an "equal" split unequal in real terms.
If you are facing a long-marriage divorce in New York and want to understand how your assets, pensions, and any maintenance obligation would be treated, connecting with a qualified New York family law attorney early can help you protect what you built over the years.
This article discusses recent news and provides general legal commentary. It does not constitute legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified family law attorney for advice specific to your situation.