A prenuptial agreement in Oklahoma is a written contract between prospective spouses that determines how property and debts will be divided if the marriage ends in divorce, typically costing $2,500 to $10,000 per spouse for attorney drafting and requiring full financial disclosure under 43 Okla. Stat. § 121. Oklahoma courts apply the three-part Burgess test to evaluate enforceability, requiring either fair provisions for both parties, complete financial disclosure before signing, or actual knowledge of the other spouse's assets. Unlike the 28 states that adopted the Uniform Premarital Agreement Act, Oklahoma relies on common law principles and case precedent to govern prenuptial agreement validity.
Key Facts: Oklahoma Prenuptial Agreements
| Requirement | Details |
|---|---|
| Written Form Required | Yes — oral agreements are unenforceable |
| Attorney Fees (Per Spouse) | $2,500–$10,000 (total $5,000–$20,000 for couple) |
| Mandatory Disclosure | Full financial disclosure required under Burgess test |
| Notarization | Strongly recommended but not legally required |
| Independent Counsel | Recommended for each party (not required by statute) |
| Prohibited Provisions | Child custody, child support (court retains jurisdiction) |
| Governing Statute | 43 Okla. Stat. § 121 (property division) |
| Enforceability Test | Three-part Burgess test from Matter of Burgess' Estate (1982) |
What Is a Prenuptial Agreement in Oklahoma?
A prenuptial agreement (also called a premarital agreement or prenup) is a legally binding contract executed before marriage that defines how assets, debts, and spousal support will be handled in the event of divorce or death. Under 43 Okla. Stat. § 121, Oklahoma courts confirm each spouse's separate property and divide jointly acquired marital property subject to valid written antenuptial contracts. The statute grants courts discretion to divide marital property "as may appear just and reasonable," making Oklahoma an equitable distribution state rather than a community property jurisdiction. Approximately 5-10% of engaged couples in the United States execute prenuptial agreements, with higher rates among second marriages, business owners, and individuals with substantial premarital assets.
Legal Framework: How Oklahoma Differs from Other States
Oklahoma has not adopted the Uniform Premarital Agreement Act (UPAA), which has been enacted in 28 states including California, Texas, Florida, and Illinois. Instead, Oklahoma prenuptial law relies on common law contract principles, statutory provisions in 43 Okla. Stat. § 121, and case law precedent established in decisions like Matter of Burgess' Estate (1982) and Griffin v. Griffin, 94 P.3d 96 (2004). This means Oklahoma courts have greater interpretive flexibility compared to UPAA states, where statutory language controls most enforceability questions. The absence of uniform statutory guidance makes judicial precedent particularly important for Oklahoma prenuptial agreements.
Under 43 Okla. Stat. § 121, Oklahoma courts divide marital property acquired jointly during marriage "subject to a valid antenuptial contract in writing." The statute explicitly recognizes written prenuptial agreements as binding contracts that supersede the court's default equitable distribution framework. However, the statute provides minimal guidance on what constitutes a "valid" agreement, leaving enforceability standards to develop through case law.
The Burgess Test: Oklahoma's Three-Part Enforceability Standard
Oklahoma courts evaluate prenuptial agreement enforceability using the three-part Burgess test established in Matter of Burgess' Estate (1982). The test consists of three alternative criteria presented in the disjunctive (connected by "or" rather than "and"), meaning the agreement is enforceable if it satisfies any one of the three factors. Under the Burgess framework, a prenuptial agreement is valid if: (1) fair and reasonable provision was made for the challenging spouse, (2) full and frank financial disclosure occurred before execution, or (3) the challenging spouse possessed generally accurate knowledge of the other party's worth at the time of signing.
The disjunctive nature of the Burgess test means Oklahoma prenuptial agreements can be enforced even without complete financial disclosure, provided the agreement makes fair provision for both parties or the challenging spouse already knew about the other's assets. In Griffin v. Griffin, 94 P.3d 96 (2004), the Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals found all three Burgess factors satisfied and reversed the trial court's refusal to enforce the prenuptial agreement, demonstrating that courts may analyze all three factors even though only one is technically required.
Mandatory Requirements for Valid Oklahoma Prenuptial Agreements
Oklahoma law imposes four core requirements for prenuptial agreement validity. First, the agreement must be in writing and signed by both parties, as oral prenuptial contracts are categorically unenforceable under Oklahoma law. Second, both parties must execute the agreement voluntarily without coercion, duress, undue influence, or pressure from the other spouse or third parties. Third, the agreement should not be unconscionable at the time of execution, though Oklahoma courts apply this standard more flexibly than UPAA states. Fourth, the agreement must provide full financial disclosure or meet one of the alternative Burgess test factors described above.
While Oklahoma statutes do not explicitly require notarization, witnesses, or independent legal counsel, family law practitioners strongly recommend all three safeguards. Notarization creates a presumption that both parties appeared before the notary and signed voluntarily, making later claims of forgery or coercion more difficult to prove. Witness signatures provide additional evidence of voluntary execution. Independent legal representation for each spouse demonstrates that both parties understood the agreement's legal implications and entered into the contract with full knowledge, significantly strengthening enforceability in contested divorce proceedings.
Financial Disclosure: What Must Be Revealed?
Full financial disclosure is the second prong of the Burgess test and represents the most common path to enforceability for Oklahoma prenuptial agreements. "Full and frank disclosure" requires each party to provide comprehensive information about all assets, income sources, debts, and liabilities before signing the agreement. This disclosure should include bank account balances, retirement account values, real estate holdings, business ownership interests, investment portfolios, inheritance expectations, and outstanding debts with specific dollar amounts and account numbers.
Oklahoma courts have not established a bright-line rule for what constitutes adequate disclosure, instead evaluating each case based on the totality of circumstances. However, family law practitioners recommend written financial statements with supporting documentation (bank statements, property appraisals, tax returns, and account statements) attached to the prenuptial agreement as exhibits. Disclosure should occur at least 30 days before the wedding date to demonstrate that both parties had adequate time to review financial information, consult with independent counsel, and make an informed decision about whether to sign the agreement.
Failure to provide complete financial disclosure does not automatically invalidate an Oklahoma prenuptial agreement. Under the third Burgess prong, the agreement remains enforceable if the challenging spouse "had a generally accurate knowledge of the other's worth" despite incomplete disclosure. However, relying on this exception creates significant litigation risk, as the challenging spouse may claim ignorance of hidden assets during divorce proceedings.
What Can Be Included in an Oklahoma Prenuptial Agreement?
Oklahoma prenuptial agreements may address any financial matter between spouses, subject to statutory limitations discussed below. Common provisions include designation of separate property, division of marital property, spousal support waivers or limitations, debt allocation, business ownership protection, inheritance rights, and estate planning coordination. Under 43 Okla. Stat. § 121, courts confirm each spouse's separate property "owned by him or her before marriage and the undisposed of property acquired after marriage by him or her in his or her own right," allowing prenuptial agreements to designate specific assets as separate property that will not be subject to equitable division.
Spousal support waivers are generally enforceable in Oklahoma prenuptial agreements, though courts retain limited discretion to award alimony in exceptional circumstances where enforcement would result in extreme hardship. The agreement may waive alimony entirely, set predetermined monthly amounts, establish maximum duration limits, or create formulas based on marriage length. Property division provisions can specify how jointly titled assets will be divided, allocate appreciation on separate property, address business ownership interests, and determine treatment of retirement accounts acquired during marriage.
Prenuptial agreements commonly include provisions addressing professional degree appreciation, stock option vesting, inheritance treatment, and tax liability allocation. Oklahoma law permits parties to contract around the default equitable distribution framework under 43 Okla. Stat. § 121, allowing unequal property divisions that would not otherwise be "just and reasonable" under judicial analysis. However, extreme disparities may trigger unconscionability challenges under the first Burgess prong.
Prohibited Provisions: What Cannot Be Included
Oklahoma law prohibits prenuptial agreements from determining child custody arrangements or child support obligations. State courts retain exclusive jurisdiction over child-related matters, which must be decided based on the child's best interests at the relevant time rather than pre-marriage contractual agreements. Any prenuptial provision addressing child custody, visitation schedules, or child support amounts is void and unenforceable, though it does not automatically invalidate the entire agreement if the remaining financial provisions are severable.
Prenuptial agreements cannot include provisions that violate public policy, encourage divorce, or waive rights to full financial disclosure. Oklahoma courts will not enforce clauses that incentivize divorce (such as bonus payments triggered by filing), contain illegal terms, or attempt to limit future modification rights. Lifestyle provisions addressing personal behavior, religious practices, household duties, or intimate relations are typically unenforceable, though they do not necessarily void the financial portions of the agreement.
Timing Considerations: When Should You Sign a Prenup?
Oklahoma law does not establish a statutory waiting period between prenuptial agreement execution and the wedding date, unlike some UPAA states that require 7 to 30 days. However, family law practitioners strongly recommend signing at least 30 to 60 days before the wedding to avoid voluntariness challenges. Agreements signed immediately before the ceremony (the night before or the morning of the wedding) create significant risk of invalidation based on duress, coercion, or insufficient time for review.
Courts evaluate voluntariness based on the totality of circumstances, including the time available for review, whether both parties had independent counsel, the parties' relative bargaining power, and evidence of pressure or ultimatums. An agreement presented 48 hours before a scheduled wedding with 200 guests and non-refundable deposits creates a strong inference of duress, as the receiving party faces extreme pressure to sign rather than cancel the wedding. By contrast, an agreement proposed 90 days before the wedding and negotiated over several weeks with independent attorneys demonstrates voluntary execution.
The recommended timeline for Oklahoma prenuptial agreements begins 4 to 6 months before the wedding date. This allows 30 to 45 days for initial drafting and financial disclosure, 30 days for review by independent counsel, 30 days for negotiation and revisions, and 30 to 60 days between final execution and the wedding. This extended timeline demonstrates good faith, eliminates duress concerns, and ensures both parties fully understand the agreement's implications before signing.
Cost of Prenuptial Agreements in Oklahoma
Attorney fees for Oklahoma prenuptial agreements typically range from $2,500 to $10,000 per spouse, creating total costs of $5,000 to $20,000 for the couple when both parties retain independent counsel. The national average flat fee for prenuptial agreement drafting is approximately $890 according to 2024-2025 ContractsCounsel data, though this figure includes simplified agreements without attorney representation for both parties. One Tulsa law firm advertises prenuptial agreement services at $1,500 flat fee as of 2025, representing the lower end of the cost spectrum.
Attorneys who charge hourly rates for prenuptial work typically bill $250 to $1,000 per hour depending on experience, reputation, and geographic location (Oklahoma City and Tulsa command higher rates than rural counties). Complex prenuptial agreements involving business valuation, multiple properties, stock options, or extensive negotiations often require 10 to 30 attorney hours per spouse, resulting in total fees of $5,000 to $30,000 when both parties are represented.
Cost factors include asset complexity, negotiation rounds, business ownership interests, prior marriage considerations, and whether the parties agree on basic terms before involving attorneys. Simple prenuptial agreements for couples with modest assets and aligned expectations typically cost $3,000 to $7,000 total. Complex agreements for high-net-worth individuals with business interests, multiple properties, and contested provisions can exceed $25,000 in combined legal fees. While these costs seem substantial, they represent a small fraction of typical divorce litigation expenses, which average $15,000 to $30,000 per spouse in Oklahoma contested divorces.
The Role of Independent Legal Counsel
While Oklahoma law does not require each party to retain independent legal counsel, having separate attorneys significantly strengthens prenuptial agreement enforceability. When one spouse presents a prenuptial agreement drafted by their attorney and the other spouse signs without independent review, courts may find the agreement procedurally unconscionable or involuntary. The unrepresented spouse can argue they did not understand the legal implications, were pressured to sign, or lacked information necessary to make an informed decision.
Independent counsel provides three critical functions. First, the attorney explains the agreement's legal effect, ensuring the client understands which rights are being waived and how the prenup differs from Oklahoma's default equitable distribution framework under 43 Okla. Stat. § 121. Second, the attorney reviews the other party's financial disclosure for completeness and accuracy, satisfying the second Burgess prong. Third, the attorney negotiates terms on behalf of their client, demonstrating that both parties engaged in arms-length bargaining rather than one spouse dictating terms.
Some Oklahoma prenuptial agreements include clauses stating that each party was advised to retain independent counsel, had the opportunity to do so, and either retained an attorney or voluntarily waived that right. If one spouse chooses not to hire an attorney despite being advised to do so, the other spouse should document this decision in writing and provide a reasonable time period for the unrepresented party to seek counsel. Courts view documented waivers of independent representation more favorably than situations where one spouse was never advised to retain counsel.
Postnuptial Agreements: A Contested Issue in Oklahoma
The enforceability of postnuptial agreements (marital contracts executed after the wedding) remains legally uncertain in Oklahoma. Unlike prenuptial agreements, which are explicitly recognized under 43 Okla. Stat. § 121 as "valid antenuptial contract[s] in writing," Oklahoma statutes do not specifically authorize or prohibit postnuptial agreements. This statutory silence has created conflicting guidance from legal practitioners and inconsistent court treatment.
Some Oklahoma family law attorneys argue that postnuptial agreements are unenforceable because they are not authorized by statute and create potential for spousal coercion after marriage when the parties' bargaining positions have fundamentally changed. Other practitioners contend that postnuptial agreements are valid contracts subject to general contract law principles, particularly when executed to address changed circumstances such as inheritance receipts, business acquisitions, or marital reconciliation after separation.
Courts that have considered postnuptial agreement enforceability have applied heightened scrutiny compared to prenuptial agreements, requiring clear evidence of voluntary execution, complete financial disclosure, fair terms, and absence of coercion. The confidential and fiduciary relationship between spouses creates greater risk that one party will exert undue influence or exploit informational advantages when negotiating after marriage. Given this legal uncertainty, couples seeking to modify financial arrangements during marriage should consult experienced family law counsel and recognize that postnuptial agreements may not be enforceable in Oklahoma divorce proceedings.
Modifying or Revoking a Prenuptial Agreement
Oklahoma prenuptial agreements can be modified or revoked after marriage through written amendment signed by both parties. Oral modifications are unenforceable, and courts will not recognize informal agreements to disregard prenuptial terms. The modification agreement should be executed with the same formalities as the original prenuptial agreement, including written form, signatures by both parties, notarization, and ideally review by independent counsel.
Common reasons for modifying prenuptial agreements include birth of children, significant changes in asset values, career changes affecting earning capacity, inheritance receipts, business sale or acquisition, or change in state residency. The modification should explicitly reference the original prenuptial agreement, identify which provisions are being amended, and state that all other terms remain in full force and effect. Complete revocation should similarly be in writing and signed by both parties, clearly stating that the prenuptial agreement is void and the parties intend to rely on Oklahoma's default equitable distribution framework under 43 Okla. Stat. § 121.
Prenuptial agreements may include "sunset clauses" that automatically terminate after a specified number of years of marriage (commonly 10, 15, or 20 years). These provisions recognize that the agreement's fairness may change over time as the parties' financial circumstances evolve. However, sunset clauses must be carefully drafted to specify exactly what happens when the clause triggers—whether the entire agreement terminates or only specific provisions such as spousal support waivers.
Enforcing Prenuptial Agreements in Oklahoma Divorce Proceedings
When a spouse seeks to enforce a prenuptial agreement during divorce, Oklahoma courts apply the three-part Burgess test to determine validity. The party seeking to enforce the agreement bears the initial burden of producing the signed written contract. Once the agreement is admitted into evidence, the burden shifts to the challenging spouse to prove that the agreement fails all three Burgess prongs or was executed involuntarily, fraudulently, or unconscionably.
The challenging spouse typically argues that: (1) the agreement does not make fair and reasonable provision for them, (2) complete financial disclosure was not provided before signing, and (3) they lacked actual knowledge of the other spouse's financial worth. If all three arguments succeed, the court may decline to enforce the agreement or modify its terms to prevent unconscionable results. However, proving all three Burgess factors requires substantial evidence, often including testimony about pre-marriage financial discussions, expert valuation of assets, and documentation of what information was shared.
Even when a prenuptial agreement satisfies the Burgess test, Oklahoma courts retain equitable discretion to modify enforcement if circumstances have dramatically changed since execution. For example, if a spouse who waived alimony in the prenuptial agreement becomes disabled during the marriage and cannot support themselves, a court might award limited spousal support despite the waiver. However, such modifications are exceptional and require proof of unforeseen circumstances that were not contemplated when the agreement was signed.
Prenuptial Agreements and Estate Planning
Oklahoma prenuptial agreements significantly impact estate planning by addressing inheritance rights, elective share waivers, and beneficiary designations. Under Oklahoma's elective share statute, a surviving spouse is entitled to claim a portion of the deceased spouse's estate even if the will provides otherwise. Prenuptial agreements commonly include mutual waivers of elective share rights, ensuring that each spouse's estate plan controls asset distribution without interference from the surviving spouse.
Beneficiary designation provisions in prenuptial agreements address retirement accounts, life insurance policies, and transfer-on-death accounts. While the prenuptial agreement may require specific beneficiary designations, the party must actually update their account beneficiaries to match the contractual obligation—the prenuptial agreement alone does not automatically change beneficiary designations. Oklahoma law follows the "governing instrument" rule, meaning beneficiary designations on file with the financial institution control over conflicting prenuptial provisions.
Couples with prenuptial agreements should coordinate with estate planning attorneys to ensure consistency between the prenuptial contract, wills, trusts, beneficiary designations, and powers of attorney. Conflicts between these documents create litigation opportunities for disappointed heirs and can undermine the prenuptial agreement's intended protections. Annual review of estate planning documents ensures continued alignment as circumstances change.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
The most common mistake in Oklahoma prenuptial agreement drafting is inadequate financial disclosure. Parties often provide summary information about assets without supporting documentation, round numbers to approximate values, or omit categories of assets they consider insignificant. Complete disclosure requires specific account balances, property appraisals, business valuations, and debt statements with account numbers and creditor information. Attached financial statements should be dated within 30 days of signing and include supporting documents as exhibits.
Another frequent error is signing too close to the wedding date. While Oklahoma law does not impose a statutory waiting period, agreements signed within two weeks of the wedding face heightened scrutiny for duress and coercion. Wedding-related pressure intensifies as the ceremony approaches, creating involuntariness concerns that can invalidate otherwise fair agreements. Starting the prenuptial process at least four months before the wedding eliminates timing-based challenges.
Failing to update the agreement after significant life changes creates enforcement problems during divorce. A prenuptial agreement drafted when both parties earned similar incomes may become unconscionable if one spouse stops working to raise children while the other's income increases substantially. Similarly, agreements made before one spouse receives a major inheritance or starts a successful business may not reflect the parties' current circumstances. Periodic review and amendment every five to ten years maintains enforceability.
Drafting without legal assistance is particularly problematic in Oklahoma given the state's reliance on common law and case precedent rather than uniform statutory standards. Online template prenuptial agreements may not address Oklahoma-specific requirements, incorporate proper Burgess test language, or include necessary provisions for asset categories unique to the couple. The cost of attorney review ($2,500 to $10,000) is minimal compared to the risk of an unenforceable agreement that fails during divorce.
Do You Need a Prenuptial Agreement?
Prenuptial agreements provide the most value for couples with significant premarital assets, business ownership interests, children from prior marriages, substantial income disparities, professional practices, inherited wealth, or family businesses. The agreement protects separate property from being characterized as marital property subject to equitable division under 43 Okla. Stat. § 121, defines spousal support obligations in advance, and provides certainty about financial outcomes in the event of divorce.
Second marriages particularly benefit from prenuptial agreements because both spouses often bring established assets, retirement accounts, and children who need inheritance protection. Without a prenuptial agreement, Oklahoma's equitable distribution framework may award marital property to the surviving spouse instead of the deceased spouse's children from a prior marriage. The prenuptial agreement clarifies these expectations and prevents family conflicts after death or divorce.
Business owners should strongly consider prenuptial agreements to protect company ownership from divorce-related division or forced sale. Under Oklahoma's equitable distribution statute, appreciation in a closely held business during marriage may be characterized as marital property subject to division, even if one spouse owned the business before marriage. The prenuptial agreement can designate the business as separate property, specify how appreciation will be treated, and establish buyout procedures if divorce occurs.
Couples without significant assets, similar earning capacity, no children from prior relationships, and aligned financial values may not need prenuptial agreements. The default equitable distribution framework under 43 Okla. Stat. § 121 provides fair outcomes for most divorces without contractual modification. However, discussing prenuptial agreements—even if the couple decides not to execute one—provides valuable insight into financial expectations, spending habits, debt management, and long-term planning.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Oklahoma recognize prenuptial agreements?
Yes, Oklahoma recognizes and enforces valid prenuptial agreements under 43 Okla. Stat. § 121, which explicitly states that courts divide jointly acquired property "subject to a valid antenuptial contract in writing." Oklahoma courts apply the three-part Burgess test to evaluate enforceability, requiring fair provisions, financial disclosure, or actual knowledge of assets. Unlike 28 states that adopted uniform legislation, Oklahoma relies on common law and case precedent.
How much does a prenuptial agreement cost in Oklahoma?
Oklahoma prenuptial agreements typically cost $2,500 to $10,000 per spouse when each party retains independent counsel, creating total costs of $5,000 to $20,000 for the couple. Simple agreements with modest assets and aligned expectations average $3,000 to $7,000 total, while complex high-net-worth agreements exceed $25,000 combined. One Tulsa law firm charges $1,500 flat fee, representing the lower end of the market as of 2025.
Do both parties need lawyers for a prenuptial agreement in Oklahoma?
Oklahoma law does not require both parties to have attorneys, but independent legal counsel is strongly recommended for enforceability. When one spouse presents an agreement drafted by their attorney and the other signs without representation, courts may find procedural unconscionability or involuntariness. Independent counsel demonstrates arms-length bargaining, ensures understanding of legal implications, and significantly strengthens the agreement's validity under the Burgess test.
What is the Burgess test for prenuptial agreements?
The Burgess test is Oklahoma's three-part enforceability standard from Matter of Burgess' Estate (1982). The test evaluates whether: (1) fair and reasonable provision was made for the challenging spouse, (2) full and frank financial disclosure occurred before execution, or (3) the challenging spouse had generally accurate knowledge of the other's assets. The test is disjunctive, meaning the agreement is valid if any one factor is satisfied.
Can a prenuptial agreement waive alimony in Oklahoma?
Yes, Oklahoma prenuptial agreements may waive spousal support entirely, though courts retain limited discretion to award alimony in exceptional circumstances where enforcement would cause extreme hardship. The agreement can waive alimony completely, set predetermined amounts, establish maximum duration limits, or create formulas based on marriage length. However, extreme waivers without fair consideration may be challenged as unconscionable under the first Burgess prong.
How long before the wedding should we sign a prenup in Oklahoma?
Oklahoma law does not establish a statutory waiting period, but family law practitioners recommend signing 30 to 60 days before the wedding to avoid voluntariness challenges. Agreements signed within two weeks of the ceremony face heightened scrutiny for duress and coercion. The ideal timeline starts 4 to 6 months before the wedding, allowing time for drafting (30-45 days), independent counsel review (30 days), negotiation (30 days), and a 30-60 day gap between signing and the ceremony.
Are postnuptial agreements enforceable in Oklahoma?
Postnuptial agreement enforceability is legally uncertain in Oklahoma. While some attorneys argue they are valid contracts subject to general contract law, others contend they are unenforceable because Oklahoma statutes do not specifically authorize marital contracts executed after the wedding. Courts that have considered postnuptial agreements apply heightened scrutiny, requiring clear evidence of voluntary execution, complete disclosure, fair terms, and absence of coercion given the confidential relationship between spouses.
Can a prenuptial agreement address child custody or child support?
No, Oklahoma law prohibits prenuptial agreements from determining child custody arrangements or child support obligations. Courts retain exclusive jurisdiction over child-related matters, which must be decided based on the child's best interests at the relevant time rather than pre-marriage contractual agreements. Any prenuptial provision addressing custody, visitation, or child support is void and unenforceable, though it does not automatically invalidate the entire agreement's financial provisions.
What happens if we don't have a prenuptial agreement?
Without a prenuptial agreement, Oklahoma courts divide marital property under the equitable distribution framework in 43 Okla. Stat. § 121. Each spouse keeps their separate property (assets owned before marriage and inheritances received during marriage), while jointly acquired marital property is divided "as may appear just and reasonable." Courts consider factors including marriage length, earning capacity, contributions to marital property, and economic circumstances. Equitable distribution does not mean equal (50/50) division.
Can we modify a prenuptial agreement after marriage?
Yes, Oklahoma prenuptial agreements can be modified or revoked after marriage through written amendment signed by both parties. Oral modifications are unenforceable. The modification should be executed with the same formalities as the original agreement, including written form, signatures, notarization, and ideally independent counsel review. The modification must explicitly reference the original agreement and specify which provisions are being changed while confirming that all other terms remain effective.
This guide was authored by Antonio G. Jimenez, Esq. (Florida Bar No. 21022), covering Oklahoma divorce law. While Attorney Jimenez is licensed in Florida, this article provides general legal information about Oklahoma prenuptial agreements based on research of Oklahoma statutes and case law. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult with an Oklahoma-licensed family law attorney for advice specific to your situation.