Tex. R. Civ. P. 299
Tex. R. Civ. P. 299 - Omitted Findings
- Official Source
- Official source link unavailable
- Freshness
- Verified Currentlast checked
Verbatim reference text. This is the full, unedited text of Tex. R. Civ. P. 299, provided for reference only — it is not legal advice, and Divorce.law is not a law firm. Always confirm current wording against the official source.
TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (March 1, 2026) Rule 299 — OMITTED FINDINGS PART II - RULES OF PRACTICE IN DISTRICT AND COUNTY COURTS Rule 299: OMITTED FINDINGS When findings of fact are sent by the trial court they must form the basis of the judgment upon all grounds of recovery and of defense embraced therein. The judgment may not be supported upon appeal by a presumed finding upon any ground of recovery or defense, no element of which has been included in the findings of fact; but when one or more elements thereof have been found by the trial court, omitted unrequested elements, when supported by evidence, will be supplied by presumption in support of the judgment. Refusal of the court to make a finding requested is reviewable on appeal. RULE 299a FINDINGS OF FACT TO BE SEPARATELY SENT AND NOT RECITED IN A JUDGMENT Findings of fact must not be recited in a judgment. If there is a conflict between findings of fact recited in a judgment in violation of this rule and findings of fact made pursuant to Rules 297 and 298, the latter findings will control for appellate purposes. Findings of fact must be sent as a document or documents separate and apart from the judgment. Notes and Comments Comment to 1990 change: To require that findings of fact be separate from the judgment and that such separate findings of fact are controlling on appeal. SECTION 11. TRIAL OF CAUSES H. Judgments Source: Texas Supreme Court — txcourts.gov | Current through March 1, 2026 Page 1
Participating Texas Divorce Attorneys
Each county on Divorce.law has one participating attorney.