Tex. R. Evid. 104
Tex. R. Evid. 104 - Preliminary Questions
- Official Source
- Official source link unavailable
- Freshness
- Verified Currentlast checked
Verbatim reference text. This is the full, unedited text of Tex. R. Evid. 104, provided for reference only — it is not legal advice, and Divorce.law is not a law firm. Always confirm current wording against the official source.
TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE (September 1, 2025) Rule 104 — Preliminary Questions ARTICLE I. — GENERAL PROVISIONS Rule 104: Preliminary Questions (a) In General. The court must decide any preliminary question about whether a witness is qualified, a privilege exists, or evidence is admissible. In so deciding, the court is not bound by evidence rules, except those on privilege. (b) Relevance That Depends on a Fact. When the relevance of evidence depends on whether a fact exists, proof must be introduced sufficient to support a finding that the fact does exist. The court may admit the proposed evidence on the condition that the proof be introduced later. (c) Conducting a Hearing So That the Jury Cannot Hear It. The court must conduct any hearing on a preliminary question so that the jury cannot hear it if: (1) the hearing involves the admissibility of a confession in a criminal case; (2) a defendant in a criminal case is a witness and so requests; or (3) justice so requires. (d) Cross-Examining a Defendant in a Criminal Case. By testifying outside the jury’s hearing on a preliminary question, a defendant in a criminal case does not become subject to cross-examination on other issues in the case. (e) Evidence Relevant to Weight and Credibility. This rule does not limit a party’s right to introduce before the jury evidence that is relevant to the weight or credibility of other evidence. Source: Texas Supreme Court — txcourts.gov | Effective September 1, 2025 Page 1
Participating Texas Divorce Attorneys
Each county on Divorce.law has one participating attorney.