Skip to main content
Verified Current

Tex. R. Evid. 410

Tex. R. Evid. 410 - Pleas, Plea Discussions, and Related Statements

Official Source
Official source link unavailable
Freshness
Verified Currentlast checked

Verbatim reference text. This is the full, unedited text of Tex. R. Evid. 410, provided for reference only — it is not legal advice, and Divorce.law is not a law firm. Always confirm current wording against the official source.

TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE (September 1, 2025) Rule 410 — Pleas, Plea Discussions, and Related Statements ARTICLE IV. — RELEVANCE AND ITS LIMITS Rule 410: Pleas, Plea Discussions, and Related Statements (a) Prohibited Uses in Civil Cases. In a civil case, evidence of the following is not admissible against the defendant who made the plea or was a participant in the plea discussions: (1) a guilty plea that was later withdrawn; (2) a nolo contendere plea; (3) a statement made during a proceeding on either of those pleas under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 or a comparable state procedure; or (4) a statement made during plea discussions with an attorney for the prosecuting authority if the discussions did not result in a guilty plea or they resulted in a later withdrawn guilty plea. (b) Prohibited Uses in Criminal Cases. In a criminal case, evidence of the following is not admissible against the defendant who made the plea or was a participant in the plea discussions: (1) a guilty plea that was later withdrawn; (2) a nolo contendere plea that was later withdrawn; (3) a statement made during a proceeding on either of those pleas under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 or a comparable state procedure; or (4) a statement made during plea discussions with an attorney for the prosecuting authority if the discussions did not result in a guilty or nolo contendere plea or they resulted in a later-withdrawn guilty or nolo contendere plea. (c) Exception. In a civil case, the court may admit a statement described in paragraph (a)(3) or (4) and in a criminal case, the court may admit a statement described in paragraph (b)(3) or (4), when another statement made during the same plea or plea discussions has been introduced and in fairness the statements ought to be considered together. Source: Texas Supreme Court — txcourts.gov | Effective September 1, 2025 Page 1

Participating Texas Divorce Attorneys

Each county on Divorce.law has one participating attorney.

Find your county's exclusive attorney